Principles vs. Narratives

This is where people get confused. They think because they have principles (plural), libtards must have them, too. They don’t. They have a Narrative, like with most religions. Just as a Hebrew around 1k BC would tell you that God destroying the people of Sodom right down to the babies in their cribs was a good thing because the Sodomites were wicked and depraved, and everything God does is good by definition, a 21st century libtard will tell you everything they do is good because their Narrative says so..

To someone who operates via principle, wearing a button that says “vote black” when you’d go apeshit if you saw a button that says “vote white” marks you as a racist. Someone who operates via Narrative has to crack the book, and the book says, “blacks have been held down by whites so it’s okay to have double standards with regard to the races.”

To someone who operates via principle, supporting race-based institutions for everyone but whites, and opposing them for only whites, marks you as a racist. Someone who operates via Narrative has to crack the book, and the book says, “whites are oppressors, everyone else is the victim, so it’s okay to have double standards for whites and non-whites.”

To someone who operates via principle, condemning an executive team for being too white, but never condeming an executive team for being too yellow, brown*, sepia, or Jewish marks you as a racist. Someone who operates via Narrative has to crack the book, and the book says, “whites are oppressors, everyone else is the victim, so it’s okay to have double standards for whites and non-whites.”

This is why libtards must control history and culture; they have to make sure their Narrative is the Narrative. If they don’t, the whole thing falls apart.

Also, obsessing about race is great protective covering for white libtards; if everyone is paying attention to the NAMs crying about white overrepresentation, no one is paying attention to the white southerner crying about Yankee overrepresentation, white Christians crying about Jewish overrepresentation, etc. They keep upwardly-mobile whites in check by pretending to give a shit about AA sinecures.

*Remember, “hispanics” are automatically “brown.” I didn’t make the rules.

Advertisements

14 thoughts on “Principles vs. Narratives

  1. Your Narrative theory doesn’t really explain liberalism, it just puts a new name on the phenomenon. You’re still left with the fact that millions of people believe something that is neither factually correct nor useful from an evolutionary point of view – quite the opposite. How did so many people adopt a way of thinking that’s directly contrary to their own racial interests? The Hebrew narrative you mention is part of a religion that served the ethnic interests of those who subscribed to it for a few thousand years, so it’s hardly a good comparison.

    • Your mistake is to conclude libtards actually believe. They don’t. They don’t believe a word of it.
      What Whites are doing, which is ostensibly maladaptive in an evolutionary fitness sense, is mouthing platitudes because it gets them social status (which among homo sapiens translates as money and power). Social status, particularly among K-strategists, is what intelligent animals are always after.
      So, who set it up so that mouthing those particular platitudes gets Whites social status? Ashkenazis — who set it up that way because having Whites mouth those platitudes gets jews an evolutionary advantage.

      • Your mistake is to conclude libtards actually believe. They don’t. They don’t believe a word of it.

        I’m not so quick to make statements like this. I think that like any narrative, libtardism has its true believers, fanatics, self-interested manipulators, “rice Christians,” etc. Some believe, some don’t. The vast majority would stop believing (and obeying) if the carrot and the stick were dropped, though. Over time, anyway.

        I agree with the rest of your post, though, so I wouldn’t be surprised if we’re just disagreeing over language here, and not substance.

    • Your Narrative theory doesn’t really explain liberalism, it just puts a new name on the phenomenon. You’re still left with the fact that millions of people believe something that is neither factually correct nor useful from an evolutionary point of view – quite the opposite.

      It explains a lot about libtardism. Foremost, it explains the utter futility of trying to understand libtardism in terms of principles or logic. That’s huge for some people, who are still stuck trying to make “sense” of libtardism. Second, it provides the basic framework for understanding libtardism; it’s just received wisdom, a mass of contradictory just-so stories. Someone who understands libtardism in this fashion isn’t surprised when he finds contradictions; he expects them.

      How did so many people adopt a way of thinking that’s directly contrary to their own racial interests?

      Raw power. That’s another open secret about libtardism. There is no “special sauce” making libtardism popular. It’s got a thin veneer of perverted altruism/Christian charity/whatever, but there’s nothing particularly original, unique, or effective about that. The fact that the Devil presents himself as the Saviour is about as old and banal as it gets.

      The Hebrew narrative you mention is part of a religion that served the ethnic interests of those who subscribed to it for a few thousand years, so it’s hardly a good comparison.

      I’m not sure I see your point. Narratives per se are not inherently good or bad for the believer. So?

      • You’re probably right about narratives. They are memes that survive in proportion to the evolutionary value of the general belief system they are part of. Its ultimate evolutionary advantage may be to people other than those who adopt it, as is the case with White liberalism.

  2. Libtards don’t have principles, they have narratives. In other words, they don’t have deep-felt and carefully considered opinions, they have fashionable postures.

    The question is who sets the narrative and who decides what’s politically fashionable. I think it’s mainly television.

    “This is why libtards must control history and culture”

    I think the Jews make the television programs and set the narrative. White people absorb the narrative by watching TV. But the Jews themselves are not libtards.

    The perverse twist is that television tells people that they are high-minded rebels if they embrace the TV message against White society. Actually, people who embrace the TV message are soft-minded lemmings. A real leftist is a lemming who thinks he is a rebel.

    The political narrative imposed on us by Jewish television has replaced useful social conventions that used to be made by society by and large. Even those of us who are not libtards remain under the influence of the television narrative, and we need a lot of hard thinking to find out what is incoherent and doesn’t make sense in it. In spite of all our efforts, it’s hard to spot all the contradictions, and that’s why we need to go on the web to find some help from other intellectual rebels. I think much of the problem with the libtards is that they are intellectually lazy. They don’t care about logical contradictions.

    • Ha, that’s weird. Who the hell would choose a dumb name like “Svigor,” lol! He’s putting more effort into his blog than I’ve ever put into any of mine, I’ll say that for him. 🙂

    • Baloo, feel free to swipe anything you like. I don’t really give a fig about credit and such stuff, at least not among friends. If anything I’m flattered anyone would want to swipe, reprint, etc. At most, I would just like people to know an evil racist and anti-Semite!!! wrote it.

  3. I’ve returned to this post a number of times, and I’m more impressed every time I read it. Explaining an illogical subject in a logical and lucid manner is very difficult. Keep up the good work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s