Anarcho Tyranny – USPS “SureMoney® (DineroSeguro®)”

(This is pretty cute. VDare and others saw it before I did but I found out about it independently, from the USPS website.)

If you’re a citizen of the United States of America, and you want to walk into an office of the United States (of America) Postal Service, and wire money to another office of the USPS, so a fellow US citizen can show his ID and pick up the cash, all within 15 minutes, well, you’re shit out of luck. The USPS offers no such service. You’ll have to settle for sending cash through the mail.

But if you’re a criminal infiltrator (AKA, criminal alien*) who crossed the border into the United States of America illegally, and you want to walk into an office of the United States (of America) Postal Service, and wire money you earned illegally to a post office in Argentina, Colombia, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, or The Dominican Republic, so someone can show his bogus ID (e.g., Matricula Consular card) and pick up the cash, all within 15 minutes, well, you’re in luck. The USPS has a tailor-made service that is just right for you: SureMoney® (DineroSeguro®)

This is anarcho-tyranny; the criminal infiltrator is provided a service that the law-abiding, tax-paying citizen is not; the law-abiding, tax-paying citizen has less freedom under this regime than a criminal infiltrator.

*:I stopped referring to illegal infiltrators and illegal aliens as illegal infiltrators and illegal aliens after I heard a libtard screech “people are not illegal!” The man had a point. Lawbreakers are not illegal; they’re criminals. Thanks libtards!

For more anarcho-tyranny, check out in-state tuition for criminal aliens

Prediction: a number of libtards have defended this by saying US citizens have the same right to send money to “Latin America” as anyone else, so there’s no “anarcho-tyranny” here, only a single standard. Prediction number two: at least one of those libtards has criticized the “ban on gay marriage” on an equal rights basis, despite the fact that homosexuals have always had the same right to marry as anyone. Prediction number three: I’ll keep this one to myself for now.


Cop Suspected in Sex Crime Dies in Shootout

Courtesy of The Daily Kenn

Cop Suspected in Sex Crime Dies in Shootout

Following an active investigation, cops in Santa Maria, CA, tried to arrest their fellow officer. He was on duty, working a DUI checkpoint in the early AM. He resisted arrest, drew his gun, fired it. So another cop shot him in the chest, and he died on the table.

Now, the first thing that sprang to my mind was, “Black or Mestizo.” It’s got NAM written all over it. 1, humping a 17 year old girl. 2, witness intimidation. 3, so bad, they couldn’t wait for him to be off duty somewhere. 4, resisted arrest. 5, drew his gun on fellow cops. These things scream “NAM.” I was thinking Black, but they’re in CA so I knew Mestizo was a good second guess.

And of course, the “name of the officer killed has not been released because some family members were still being notified”. That, and he’s a Mestizo:

The leader of a Latino civil rights group is asking whether police should have attempted the impromptu arrest in public, the Santa Maria Times reports. “How well trained are they to respond to these crises?” he asked. But police chief Danny Macagni says there was no outside agency to call at one in the morning, and cited evidence “that demanded that we go out and take this officer off the street immediately.” The dead officer, however, won’t be honored in the usual police fashion because “that would be totally hypocritical on my part.” A small memorial with a candle and balloon has been placed near the shooting.

(Cop Suspected in Sex Crime Dies in Shootout)

So, the predictive power of racism pays off again. 1-5 screamed “NAM,” and they were right. And of course, 24+ hours weren’t enough to “notify the officer’s family,” because as of a few minutes ago, all the stories are still running the “name withheld” stuff. I guess they have to tour Majico looking for all 10k of his “close family,” before they can release the scumbag’s name.

Note: anybody know the age of consent in Mexifornia? I know the prudish liberal media likes to pretend an adult screwing a 17 year old is ipso facto a crime nationwide, but it isn’t. In fact in most places, it’s not, because in most places, the age of consent is 16 or 17. So I’m kind of curious what the “sex crime” is here. Libtard condottieri journalists are of course clouding the issue by using “misconduct” and “sex crime” as if they’re interchangeable, which they aren’t; it’s entirely possible that he violated departmental regulations without violating the law.